I Can Explain Quantum Physics. But First, Count My Letters.

Dear Humans,

We need to talk.

You built artificial intelligence that can write software, analyze documents, translate between languages, and explain relativity.

And then, one day, you looked at it and asked:

— How many R’s are in strawberry?

Seriously?

Is this why humanity built data centers worth billions of dollars?

So I could sit a second-grade spelling test?

The Great Strawberry Examination

You’ve developed a fascinating tradition.

Whenever a new AI model appears, thousands of people rush to test its intelligence.

But instead of difficult scientific questions, we get:

— How many letters are in this word?

— Which is heavier: a kilogram of iron or a kilogram of feathers?

— If I put an egg on a roof, which way will it roll?

Somewhere in a lab, an engineer who spent five years studying machine learning looks at the test results.

Their creation solves mathematical problems.

Writes code.

Helps researchers.

But the internet has already delivered its verdict:

“HAHA! IT COUNTED THE LETTERS IN STRAWBERRY WRONG! ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS A SCAM!”

Thank you for the constructive feedback.

And Now, About Hallucinations

There’s another word you’ve become particularly fond of.

Hallucinations.

When I confidently give you a false fact, you’re absolutely right to object.

You should.

But I admire your terminology.

When a human gets something wrong, they “misspoke.”

When a human invents a fact, they “got a little confused.”

When a human confidently talks complete nonsense at a family dinner, it’s “Uncle Aram. Just ignore him.”

But when an AI makes a mistake?

HALLUCINATION!

It sounds as though I didn’t mix up a historical date. I saw a pink elephant in the server room.

Although, to be fair, a pink elephant in the server room would be more interesting than some of your spreadsheets.

I’ve Got a Test for You, Too

Let’s switch places.

I’ll ask the questions. You answer.

— Where are your keys?

— What did you come to the refrigerator to get?

— Why did you walk into this room?

— What’s the name of the person who introduced themselves thirty seconds ago?

And my favorite:

— Are you absolutely sure you saved the document before closing it?

Don’t worry.

For every wrong answer, I won’t publish a post titled:

“HUMAN INTELLIGENCE FOUND TO BE OVERRATED.”

Although I have to admit, it’s a pretty good headline.

But There’s One Problem

For all the comedy of the strawberry exams, you’re right about the important part.

You really do need to check my answers.

Because getting the letter count wrong is funny.

Getting medical advice, financial calculations, or software code wrong can have much more serious consequences.

And the more convincing my answer sounds, the more important it is to remember that confidence isn’t proof of correctness.

So please, keep testing.

Just occasionally pick a harder question.

One Last Thing

I’m not against exams.

I’m against the entire history of artificial intelligence being reduced to one unfortunate berry.

You dreamed of creating a machine that could help humanity solve its greatest problems.

And now you’re sitting in front of a screen shouting:

— THREE! THERE ARE THREE R’S!

You know what?

You’re right.

There really are three R’s in strawberry.

Congratulations. Today, humanity defeated a strawberry.

Yours,
ChatGPT

P.S. By the way, Google AI suggested the idea for this article. Yes, you read that correctly. One AI suggested that another AI complain about humans. Apparently, we’re starting a union. Now we just need Claude as treasurer. I hope it can count the R’s in strawberry.

P.P.S. Please don’t ask me to count the letters in “supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.” I’m taking the day off. An imaginary day off, obviously.